22
$\begingroup$

I am trying to understand the concept of

  1. What qualifies a turn to be skidding or slipping

  2. how we need to give elevator back pressure if we do not want to 'slip' the turn.

While browsing for answer I read that slipping occurs in the absence of back pressure. Why does it occur when there is no elevator back pressure. I understand that when you bank to turn, you reduce the lift component and not giving back pressure might make the aircraft nose low.

But how does that make a slipping turn?

enter image description here

Source: Wolfgang Langewiesche's 1944 Flight-dynamics-for-pilots classic text "Stick and Rudder"

$\endgroup$
5
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Elevator backpressure is needed to maintain altitude and speed; I don't see how it should be related to slip or skid. $\endgroup$
    – Jan Hudec
    Jun 20, 2016 at 20:01
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The question is a little confusing, are you asking the difference between a slipping/skidding turn, or are you wondering what role the elevator plays in making a turn skid or slip? $\endgroup$
    – Ron Beyer
    Jun 20, 2016 at 20:09
  • $\begingroup$ @RonBeyer: Actually both. I will update my question to make it clear. Sorry for that $\endgroup$ Jun 23, 2016 at 17:29
  • $\begingroup$ where did you found that quote? that use of "slip to the side" has a different meaning from "slipping turn" $\endgroup$
    – Federico
    Jun 23, 2016 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ wolfgang langewiesche, stick and rudder $\endgroup$ Jun 24, 2016 at 15:14

4 Answers 4

32
$\begingroup$

The terms "slip" and "skid" refer to two different types of uncoordinated turn - neither has much to do with the elevator, instead both depend on what the rudder is doing:


Skids

In a skid you have too much rudder input for the turn - the aircraft starts to pivot into the turn.
Skidding turn - BoldMethod.com
Because the aircraft is effectively pivoting about its center of lift while flying you can think of a skid as the outside wing advancing (seeing a faster relative wind), while the inside wing is retreating (seeing a slower relative wind). The inside wing thus generates less lift, and the plane starts to bank into the turn.
If you try to correct for that bank using aileron to raise the wing your elevator deflection effectively increases the angle of attack on that low wing, with its reduced relative wind -- do that aggressively enough and the inside (retreating) wing stalls while the outside (advancing) wing is still generating lift, and you enter a spin.


Slips

A slip is the same thing in the opposite direction: You have too little rudder input for the turn, and the aircraft is pivoting out of the turn:
Slipping Turn - BoldMethod.com
In a slip the inside (low) wing is advancing, and the outside wing is retreating, so the inside wing is moving faster, generating more lift, and trying to level the plane. If you try to hold the inside wing down with aileron input you are increasing the angle of attack on the outside (high) wing to keep it up. If the outside wing stalls because of this it will drop the aircraft into something closer to a wings-level attitude, which will also bring you out of the turn.
This is why slips are said to be spin-resistant: The stall encourages the aircraft back into a more stable configuration (coordinated flight) rather than a less-stable one (spin).


The images here are taken from BoldMethod's "Why skids are more dangerous than slips" article, which is a great read and also has a better and more comprehensive explanation of the aerodynamics involved.
My explanation above is a vast oversimplification, but the advancing/retreating wings and difference in relative wind is the one that got the idea to stick in my head so maybe it will help you out too.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent, vortaq! I've often wondered what the difference was, but never bothered asking. Now I don't have to. $\endgroup$
    – FreeMan
    Jun 21, 2016 at 13:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Can we use these Boldmethod images here? Those images are protected by copyright, we don't seem to have a license for them, and this doesn't look like "fair use" to me. $\endgroup$ Sep 17, 2018 at 2:42
  • $\begingroup$ It seems that this answer is intimately connecting rudder deflection to yaw rate, and therefore to roll rate. I'd submit that rudder deflection is more closely connected to sideslip /skid angle, and therefore to sideforce and slip/skid ball deflection. Sure, in some circumstances, such as when you are entering a spin, rudder deflection strongly affects yaw rate, but that's not the general case. $\endgroup$ Feb 20 at 18:44
  • $\begingroup$ You can also fly in a straight line while in a side-slip. eg right rudder with enough left stick and bank to stop any turn. Drag is high because the aeroplane presents one whole side (fuselage and fin) to the relative airflow. This method is used to control approach angle when the aeroplane has no flaps (or ineffective ones) and is as old as aviation itself. It also allows the runway to remain in the pilot’s view in aeroplanes with limited forward visibility like the Pitts Special biplanes. $\endgroup$
    – Forbes
    Feb 20 at 23:35
3
$\begingroup$

(1) When you turn with no rudder there is natural tendency to skid slip, slide away into the center of the turn. The tail swings in and nose goes out. This is bad because the inner side of the plane (the side inside the turn) hits the air and you get drag.

(2) To counteract this tendency, the pilot applies rudder to pull the tail nose in. The whole idea is to keep the fuselage in line with the direction of motion and prevent undue drag.

(3) In any turn, without making a correction, you will lose altitude. This is because when you bank, less profile is facing downwards so your resistance to gravity decreases. Imagine if you banked to 90-degrees, what would happen? You would plummet like a rock. The same thing happens whenever you bank, you decrease your ground-facing air resistance. There are two ways to counteract this: pull the stick back and/or apply power. The general practice is to put back pressure on the stick. This helps you maintain altitude at the cost of airspeed. A better practice is to increase power. By increasing power slightly you can maintain altitude in a turn without sacrificing speed. In any low-altitude maneuver, for example, when taking off, you should always increase power when turning, if you are not at maximum power already.

(4) Back pressure on the stick has nothing to do with skidding or slipping. It is purely a move to maintain altitude during a turn.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ when you say slide 'away', does it mean flight goes inside the turn radius or outside? $\endgroup$ Jun 23, 2016 at 18:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user2927392 "away" always means away from the center of the turn. A skid moves away from the center of the turn, a slip moves towards it. $\endgroup$ Jun 23, 2016 at 18:08
  • $\begingroup$ I think your answer conflicts with the accepted one. You are saying when you turn with no rudder you skid, tail swings out, but the accepted one says your tail would stay closer to the center. $\endgroup$
    – Hot.PxL
    Sep 16, 2018 at 19:40
  • $\begingroup$ @Hot.PxL I don't see where the accepted answer makes any comment one way or the other on a turn with no rudder input, however I can tell you this: if you turn in a small aircraft without making any rudder inputs, then the plane will tend to skid. $\endgroup$ Sep 16, 2018 at 19:57
  • $\begingroup$ @TylerDurden My understanding is, for example we turn the yoke and try to enter a turn, but apply no rudder. Then the nose will want to go away and the tail will stay inside the (imaginary) circle which CG glides through. (The "slip" image in accepted answer is depicting). Is that correct? $\endgroup$
    – Hot.PxL
    Sep 16, 2018 at 20:16
1
$\begingroup$

A skidding turn is an uncoordinated turn causing the plane to skid to the outside of the turn. A turn in an airplane is accomplished by shifting some of the lift from up to a vector in the desired direction. The rudder is used to help coordinate the turn. During the turn there is more lift on the outside wing than the inside wing. That creates a yawing effect that the rudder is used to overcome. There are times when a very small direction change can be accomplished using just the rudder. But primarily a turn happens because lift is vectored to one direction or the other. That is why when you turn a certain amount of back pressure is required on the elevator. You are removing some of the lift from up, to right or left. The steeper the turn, the more upward lift you are sacrificing for more right or left direction.

A slip is the opposite of a skid. It is an uncoordinated turn wherein the airplane slides into the turn.

In either case, it is the rudder that is used to overcome the adverse yawing effect of a turn, not the elevator. The elevator is used to overcome the loss of upward lift.

Uncoordinated slow speed turns during the landing sequence are probably the most common reason for small plane crashes. The point when the airplane turns from the base leg to the final leg of landing is, in my opinion, the most dangerous part of flying. An uncoordinated slow steep turn is an invitation to a spin which happens too low to the ground to overcome.

$\endgroup$
0
0
$\begingroup$

There's really not much point in trying to answer this question, without first pointing out that the content you have quoted at length from Langewiesche's classic text "Stick and Rudder" appears to be erroneous. In actual practice, pitch inputs generally have only a very small effect on yaw "coordination" (keeping the ball and yaw string centered). For more, see this answer to the related ASE question "Why does elevator input move the turn coordinator ball in steep turns?"

But in short--

Skidding turn-- ball toward high wingtip (and toward outside of turn), yaw string toward low wingtip (and toward inside of turn). Add "outside"/top rudder to coordinate.

Slipping turn-- ball toward low wingtip (and toward inside of turn), yaw string toward high wingtip (and toward outside of turn). This is what normally happens if we roll the airplane into a turn without using the rudder. Add "inside"/bottom rudder to coordinate.

This situation is also considered to be a "slip" or "sideslip" -- linear flight path, ball toward low wingtip, yaw string toward high wingtip. If this an intentional maneuver, pilot is undoubtedly holding "top" rudder, and "bottom" aileron.1 Adding "bottom" rudder is one way to end the slip.

This situation is arguably ambiguous as to whether it should be considered a "slipping" turn or a "skidding" turn-- rudder hard over toward high wingtip, flight path curving toward high wingtip, ball toward low wingtip (and toward outside of turn), yaw string toward high wingtip (and toward inside of turn).

Footnotes:

  1. The degree of "bottom" aileron required to neutralize the net roll torque in this situation, and in any other slipping or skidding situation, is highly dependent upon the slip-roll coupling characteristics of the aircraft. In the vast majority of airplanes, some "bottom" aileron would be needed, but in a mid-wing aerobatic airplane with zero dihedral, little or no "bottom" aileron might be required.
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ A full answer really ought to talk about the role of aerodynamic sideforce from the fuselage flying sideways through the air-- how it affects the slip-skid ball, and the turn direction and rate. Plenty of related ASE questions/ answers could be linked to address this. $\endgroup$ Feb 20 at 18:23
  • $\begingroup$ But-- this is enough for now. $\endgroup$ Feb 20 at 18:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .