On a recent passenger flight my son asked me, "How come we're able to build a 737 for \$50M - \$80M with fantastic reliability and technology but can't design a PA system so that we can understand the pilot's announcements?" Many are quite un-intelligible but the cabin crew announcements generally are intelligible. I didn't have a good answer. Does anyone know?
As a follow on and of more concern, if pilots' microphone technique / equipment is so poor then how does air-traffic control understand them? I know there is a limited vocabulary set and that standard phrases are used to avoid mis-hearing but there must be some problems.
as there is only one
no there isn't, and I suspect that this might be the problem. All of the big iron cockpits I am familiar with have a hand mike, and I've seen the flight crew use this for cabin address in preference to the headset boom mike. I suspect that the maintenance on this might not as rigorous as for the headsets and, if the quality is poor, does anyone bother to raise a maintenance snag for it? $\endgroup$they use the same device for radio and PA
. Sorry to be a pain, no they don't. There is almost no commonality other than the ability to select either mike as the input source to PA or radio. The comms selector panel is the only common piece and this is little more than a set of switches. $\endgroup$