5
$\begingroup$

Is the APU a mini-jet engine, or some other type of motor? I know its purpose is to provide power when the engines are off, but what kind of motor/engine is used to generate the power?

I assume this differs from one type of aircraft to the other, but for the purposes of narrowing down the responses - I would like to know specifically about Boeing's APUs lets say on the 737NG.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Since the only fuel available on an airliner is kerosene, the APU is a kerosene-powered jet. Using a different and maybe more efficient type of engine would require an independent fuel system, which does not make sense for the small savings possible.

From the 737.org page on APUs:

There are many different APUs available for the 737. The most common is the Garrett GTCP (Gas Turbine Compressor [air] Power unit [electrics]) 85-129. This was standard for the series 1/200 but when the -300 was introduced it was found that two to three times the energy was needed to start the larger CFM56 engines. Garrett produced the 85-129[E] which had a stretched compressor, ie the impellers were lengthened and the tip diameters increased. When the 737-400 was introduced, even more output was required and Garrett produced the 85-129[H]. This has an Electronic Temperature Control which limits hot section temperatures depending upon demand and ambient temperatures. By 1989 the 85-129[H] was the most standard APU in all 737 models, although there are actually 14 different models of the 85-129 in service with 737s.

To answer your question about the 737 NG, it continues:

Other APUs available are the Garrett GTCP 36-280(B) and the Sundstrand APS 2000 on the 3/4/500; and the Allied Signal GTCP 131-9B for the NGs. The main difference between them is that the Garrett is hydro-mechanical whereas Sundstrand and Allied Signal are FADEC controlled.

Be sure to load the 737.org page, it has lots of pictures and data on the APUs.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You can modify a diesel engine to run on Jet-A. But I believe that a reciprocating engine would be heavier than the jet. $\endgroup$ – ratchet freak Jan 28 '16 at 9:02
  • $\begingroup$ @ratchetfreak: Yes, and it would need an additional compressor. You get that part almost for free in a jet. The fuel economy would be better, however. $\endgroup$ – Peter Kämpf Jan 28 '16 at 11:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ratchetfreak "I believe that a reciprocating engine would be heavier than the jet." Based on some of the diesel blocks I've seen, I could imagine one being heavier than a B737-NG! ;) $\endgroup$ – FreeMan Jan 28 '16 at 17:44
  • $\begingroup$ @ratchetfreak: You don't need to modify the diesel engine; they run just fine on jet fuel as is. $\endgroup$ – Sean Jun 12 at 1:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.