6
$\begingroup$

I'm interested in knowing what aiming points on runways are used for:

  • Why do some runways have aim points and some do not?
  • We say that pilots must use the maximum length of the runway. Therefore, why don't we touch down on or near the threshold lines as our aiming point?
|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Hi @adil. Have a look at this question. $\endgroup$ – aeroalias Jan 17 '16 at 14:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This answer seems to adress most of it: aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/16714/… Duplicate? $\endgroup$ – curious_cat Jan 17 '16 at 18:45
  • $\begingroup$ @curious_cat I agree that question is related, but this one differs at least in that it asks why some runways do not have aiming point markings $\endgroup$ – J Walters Jan 17 '16 at 20:13
  • $\begingroup$ @curious_cat, I don't see that addressing the second point and that points seems the more important one here. $\endgroup$ – Jan Hudec Jan 17 '16 at 22:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "We say that pilots must use the maximum length of the runway." Not sure where you've heard that, my goal in conducting landings is to use the least amount of runway possible without being hard on the brakes/tires. Usually this involves touching down as soon as possible, on the glideslope/airspeed. Maybe its just not worded the best? Often when doing short-field approaches you want to touch down as close to the threshold as possible, otherwise the touchdown point is just fine. $\endgroup$ – Ron Beyer Jan 17 '16 at 22:34
4
$\begingroup$

I'll try to answer just the first portion. The aiming point marking basically serves as a visual aiming point for a landing aircraft.

Aiming point

Image from code7700.com

They are not found in all runways because the requirement is based on the aerodrome code number and they are not required in all cases. Aerodrome Reference Code from ICAO Annex 14 Volume I:

Aerodrome Code

Table from ICAO Annex 14 Vol I

From the Same reference:

5.2.5.1 An aiming point marking shall be provided at each approach end of a paved instrument runway where the code number is 2, 3 or 4.

5.2.5.2 Recommendation.— An aiming point marking should be provided at each approach end of:

a) a paved non-instrument runway where the code number is 3 or 4;

b) a paved instrument runway where the code number is 1; when additional conspicuity of the aiming point is desirable.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Something's up with that diagram... it shows two 500-foot distances adding up to less than a 1000-foot distance starting from the same point. $\endgroup$ – 2012rcampion Apr 16 '16 at 13:14
2
$\begingroup$
  • We say that pilots must use the maximum length of the runway. Therefore, why don't we touch down on or near the threshold lines as our aiming point?

No. Using maximum length of the runway just follows from more general rule to have as much margin of error as possible. But errors can happen in both directions. Landing long is more common, so it makes sense to leave the largest margin at the end of the runway, but landing short also happens, so some margin should be left at the start too. The 1000 ft is considered reasonable margin.

Note that for small aircraft, some advocate using the middle part of the runway and leaving about as much margin at both ends. However the PAPI and ILS can't be adjusted for each aircraft, so they are installed at the standard 1,000 ft past threshold mark.

Besides, pilots don't have to use full length of the runway. There is also LAHSO.

|improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.