1
$\begingroup$

A jet aircraft seems for sure very complex as such. But, referring Wikipedia, a "complex aircraft" (as legally defined) has:

  • A retractable landing gear
  • Flaps
  • and A controllable pitch propeller

And there is no propeller in a jet.

What are the reasons of defining "complex aircraft" so that it does not cover jets? Are these reasons other than historical?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ What jurisdiction/CAA is this? (FAA, UK CAA, EASA, etc...?) $\endgroup$ – UnrecognizedFallingObject Dec 5 '15 at 22:54
  • $\begingroup$ Related $\endgroup$ – Pondlife Dec 5 '15 at 23:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, the complexity associated with variable pitch propeller is not there in a jet either. $\endgroup$ – Jan Hudec Dec 7 '15 at 9:07
3
$\begingroup$

All jets require a type rating. Therefore you don't need the complex endorsement directly (other than needing it likely for your commercial checkride, which requires a complex aircraft). The historical training progression is: simple prop, complex single engine prop (requiring the complex endorsement), high performance (200 hp+, though this one is sometimes not gotten), light multi-engine props, and then finally moving into heavier turboprops and then jets which require type ratings.

Note, my answer is FAA specific, and other agencies might have different rules/interpretations for this issue.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ A small point, but you can get a type rating without getting your commercial license, so you don't necessarily need to have your complex endorsement in order to fly a jet. $\endgroup$ – Lnafziger Dec 6 '15 at 5:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.