5
$\begingroup$

What exactly does the term "fly-by-wire" mean? Where did it originate? I understand that it refers to control systems. If an aircraft is not fly-by-wire, what is it? That is, what are the alternatives?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Fly-by-wire is a system that replaces the conventional manual flight controls of an aircraft with an electronic interface. It is called "fly-by-wire" because the movements of flight controls are converted to electronic signals transmitted by wires. $\endgroup$ – Him Oct 6 '15 at 23:08
7
$\begingroup$

The fly-by-wire means that in the aircraft, the (pilot or autopilot) control inputs are fed to the (flight) computer, which processes them and determines the required control surface movements and transmits this by electrical signals (through wires, hence the term fly-by-wire) to the appropriate actuators.

This is in contrast with the mechanical system, where the pilot control inputs are directly transmitted to the flight control actuators, through push-pull rods or cables. The following figure shows the schematic of a mechanical and fly-by-wire system.

Fly-by wire

Source: euroaviasevilla.es

The first aircraft to use this mode of control was the Avro Arrow, which used a dual-channel fly-by-wire system made of analog circuits. The flight control mechanism on the Apollo Lunar Module was fly-by-wire, the Primary Guidance, Navigation, and Control System, which was referred to as PGNCS, pronounced 'pings'.

Later, NASA tested the fly-by-wire system in a F-8 aircraft, a schematic of which is shown below. Note that it uses Apollo flight computer.

F8 Fly-by-wire

Image from Computers Take Flight- A history of NASA's Pioneering Fly-by-wire Project

In civil aviation Concorde and A320 (which had a digital-fly-by-wire system) introduced fly-by-wire systems, while in military, it was the F-16. At present, almost all combat aircraft and large airliners use fly-by-wire systems.

As an extension, the system is called fly-by-light (or fly-by-optics) is the signals are transmitted through optical cables. If the wires are eliminated altogether, it is called fly-by-wireless.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Not all FBW systems have a computer to interpret the input and provide adjusted output. Some just use wires to transmit the pilots intent to the control surface actuator instead of cables/rods. $\endgroup$ – FreeMan Oct 7 '15 at 16:11
6
$\begingroup$

Fly-by-wire means that the control commands travel by wire to the control surfaces. There, either electric motors or hydraulic actuators do the physical work of moving the surfaces. The pilot has either a conventional control column or a side stick with transducers which will encode the commands of the pilot into electric signals. Optionally, a computer can be employed to modify the signals such that overload conditions or dangerous maneuvers are avoided.

Other control systems can be summed up as mechanical: Some pushrod or steel cable runs all the length to the control surface. To relief the pilot of the mechanical work, those pushrods can be boosted by hydraulics, so the mechanical movement of the control column or stick will become a command for the hydraulic actuator, similar to the electric signals in a fly-by-wire system. Early systems used a variety of aerodynamic means to lighten control forces, and small aircraft have low enough control forces that they can be flown with a direct, unboosted mechanical linkage. In some cases, it is even necessary to artificially increase control forces to give the pilot enough feedback.

Russian combat aircraft prefer to use pairs of steel cables over pushrods because they will be more resilient when hit by a bullet. Also, most early aircraft used cables for weight reasons. Today, pushrods are preferred because they allow a stiffer linkage and less friction.

Regarding the history of fly-by-wire, I could just copy the Wikipedia entry, but I prefer to link to it here.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The irony is that airplanes that are not fly-by-wire are fly by wires... Steel cables that is.

Earlier planes (and many smaller GA planes to this day) typically use steal control cables that directly connect the control surfaces to the joke or stick. Such as can be seen running to the tail section of this plane

enter image description here (source)

This is not limited to small planes by any means, many larger planes use control cables as well. You can also use control rods which is common place on Mooney aircraft however those generally come at the cost of weight but may provide a more tactile feel.

enter image description here

Fly-By-Wire generally means that the control inputs are translated via electronic cables to a set of hydraulic actuators to move the control surface. To expand on that, FBW systems also decide what movements the control surfaces will make and often do not allow the surfaces to move such that it will put the plane in a dangerous attitude. Simple electric signal control of actuators is not necessarily FBW and even planes as simple as the Cessna 172 have electronically controlled flaps that are not considered FBW.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Fly-by-wire (FBW) is a system that replaces the conventional manual flight controls of an aircraft with an electronic interface. The movements of flight controls are converted to electronic signals transmitted by wires (hence the fly-by-wire term), and flight control computers determine how to move the actuators at each control surface to provide the ordered response. The fly-by-wire system also allows automatic signals sent by the aircraft's computers to perform functions without the pilot's input, as in systems that automatically help stabilize the aircraft, or prevent unsafe operation of the aircraft outside of its performance envelope.

Reference: Wikipedia

Light aircraft use a direct mechanical linkage using cables and/or push rods. Larger aircraft, and aircraft manufactured before the introduction of FBW use hydraulic actuators slaved directly to the controls in the cockpit.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Upvoted to put the vote count to null, because the edited answer is correct, but the upvote is mainly due to egid's edit. Next time, never copy paste without a ref to the page. Welcome on StackExchange/Aviation. $\endgroup$ – Karl Stephen Oct 8 '15 at 19:23
  • $\begingroup$ @KarlStephen Egid's edit only added the block quote markup. The reference to Wikipedia was clearly cited in my original post, and links directly to the relevant page. $\endgroup$ – user11516 Oct 8 '15 at 19:35
  • $\begingroup$ Ah! Sorry. You're right; I don't know how it ended me believing you wrote only the quoted part since I did checked by clicking the "edited yesterday" above egid's tag. That's weird, really weird. Were part of the page weren't fully loaded when I checked ? or my sanity is starting to fade :/ :scratchHead: Unfortunately, I can't upvote more. What I can do is to delete my comments (both this one and the above; should I ? - by the way, I personnaly disagree downvotes based on copy/paste while the answer is correct. At most, I don't upvote, but that's personal opinion) $\endgroup$ – Karl Stephen Oct 8 '15 at 21:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.