36
$\begingroup$

It seems like a lot of the newer airliners have winglets or wing fences. How do they improve aircraft performance?

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
32
$\begingroup$

they reduce the wingtip vortex and the associated drag by deflecting the air that wants to escape over the tip back down

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d4/737-NG_winglet_effect_%28simplified%29.svg/800px-737-NG_winglet_effect_%28simplified%29.svg.png(source: wikipedia)

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For lots more detail than you ever wanted to know about wingtip vorticies, their induced drag, and wingtip devices to counteract them check out Sighard Hoerner's book Fluid Dynamic Drag. The ZenithAir website also has some more accessible explanations (about 1/3 of the way down under "Wing Tips"). $\endgroup$ – voretaq7 Mar 7 '14 at 20:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @voretaq7 How exactly does the induced drag of wingtip vortices work? The book doesn't really mention this. $\endgroup$ – user7241 Dec 24 '17 at 6:17
18
$\begingroup$

Wing generates lift by creating area of higher pressure below and area of lower pressure above.

At the wing tip, some air flows around the tip, reducing the pressure differential and thus the efficiency of the wing. This is called transverse flow. The wing tip reduces this flow, thus improving the efficiency.

The effect of wing tip is actually similar to making the wing a bit longer, but since the wing tip does not produce lift itself, it is less stressed and therefore can be lighter, even though the extension would be about 1/3 shorter for comparable efficiency.

$\endgroup$
11
$\begingroup$

Winglets, raked wingtips, fences, sharklets all do the same thing; reduce drag. When the wing is working hard (high AoA), it will produce a lot of this kind of drag since vortecies of all kinds will be stronger. Winglets makes the passage of air from the bottom of the wing to the lower pressure top of the wing more difficult, thus reducing induced drag.

The big manufacturers explored offering winglet retrofit kits to their customers but at the time, it wasn't economical since fuel was so cheap. These days, however, the retrofits pay for themselves fairly quickly even on airplanes wings that have a fairly high aspect ratio. Every 737/757/767 guy that I talk to says they get in the neighbor hood of a 4-6% boost in fuel savings.

On an tangentially related topic, the hump from the satellite internet antennas has a negligible impact on performance, less than 1% according to the few guys that I talked to.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Lol, what? 1% of fuel for just an antenna? No thanks! $\endgroup$ – Alexus Jul 3 '15 at 16:52
1
$\begingroup$

Basically what happens with an airplane without a wingtip is the high pressure area comes over the lower pressure area and creates a giant vortex called a wing tip vortex and the winglet reduces the strength of the vortex reduces drag, increasing lift, and increasing the aircrafts range.

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ an airplane without a wingtip has infinite wings $\endgroup$ – Federico Aug 7 '15 at 11:55
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ or circular wings $\endgroup$ – Markus Mikkolainen May 27 '17 at 23:59

protected by Community Nov 8 at 8:43

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.