Following on from Why are first/business class seats at the front?, in which part of a large commercial jet cabin would I experience the least turbulence? On the one hand I would have said that sitting near the wings (near the centre of gravity) is best, but subjectively it feels like the ride near the front is "smoother". Can anyone give me some more solid information? I imagine it also depends on the aircraft type?

  • $\begingroup$ The answer is in the post you linked to. Therefore, this is a duplicate. Not sure what @Iceman is doing ;) $\endgroup$
    – Simon
    Commented Aug 31, 2015 at 8:03
  • $\begingroup$ I think the answer says turbulence in front is less than the back, not it is minimum there. $\endgroup$
    – aeroalias
    Commented Aug 31, 2015 at 8:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I've voted to re-open this, as although the linked post does have some reference to the front generally being smoother, it does not fully answer the question being posited here, nor is the question a duplicate of the one posted. Although the reference in the other answer is correct, it is not necessarily a complete answer. For example it may be that "Business class is at the front because the front is smoother than the back", when splitting the cabin into exactly two parts, but it may actually be that there is a more specific answer that is relevant if you are choosing one seat for one purpose $\endgroup$
    – Jon Story
    Commented Sep 1, 2015 at 13:02
  • $\begingroup$ On the ground . $\endgroup$
    – Vikki
    Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 4:00

2 Answers 2


The elasticity of the fuselage does indeed dampen the load factors from gusts somewhat. Therefore, gust-induced accelerations are a little higher over the wing than in the forward or rear fuselage. If the gust causes a pitching motion, this creates its own accelerations which adds to the bumps from the vertical accelerations. Elevator deflections cause similar pitching motions, and their accelerations are more pronounced in the rear fuselage since the aircraft will pivot around a point ahead of the center of gravity.

The main factor, however, is the location of the axis of rotation of the Dutch roll eigenmotion of airliners. This is a weakly damped oscillation which creates lateral accelerations which are bigger the more aft you sit in the fuselage. The Convair 880 was hurriedly test-flown with nobody sitting in the back, and the pilots were happy with its comfort level. The first passengers, however, got seasick from the Dutch roll motion, which was only detected when the passengers sitting in the rear of the cabin complained.

Modern airliners offer better comfort thanks to artificially enhanced stability, but even there you are better off sitting in front. I once flew on an Egypt Air Boeing 777 from Cairo to Frankfurt, and the captain flew through the tops of Cumulus clouds sitting over the Alps. Soon the obvious sounds and smell told me that people in the back were filling their air sickness bags. Maybe half of the rear third of the seats was affected, while the forward two thirds had only a few cases of airsick passengers.


The seats over the wings should have the least turbulence as they are near to the center of mass and center of pressure(over which the lift acts).

The front and rear should experience more (with slightly more in the aft).

Thought I'm not able to find any scientific studies into this, see here and here.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .