8
$\begingroup$

Is there any airspeed limit for deploying a ram air turbine? Can airspeed be determined from the rate of its propeller rotation? Could that data be used to determine altitude?

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Why should there be vertical speed limit? The turbine only cares whether it is facing the relative wind, not how it is oriented. $\endgroup$ – Jan Hudec Aug 23 '15 at 11:13
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I refuse to vote for close as I am hoping for it to be a typo as that question would be interesting if the horizontal speed is considered... $\endgroup$ – Maverick283 Aug 23 '15 at 22:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Does he mean the resistance of high wind to avoid the mechanics to drop it out? $\endgroup$ – TesterMen Tester Aug 24 '15 at 6:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yes, this could be an interesting question if the OP clarifies a little about what he's looking for. I would assume that any answer (to the first part, at least) will be type-specific. $\endgroup$ – reirab Sep 1 '15 at 3:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Looks like a good question now. Hope someone comes by with a response or two. $\endgroup$ – FreeMan Sep 2 '15 at 15:46
13
$\begingroup$

RAT extension is prevented below 100 knots. The RAT can be extended and used at any speed above this speed. Generated power may be decreased below 130 knots. The RAT is governed and has a constant rotational speed. The RAT can be extended automatically and manually.

"Can airspeed be determined from the rate of its propeller rotation?": No, due to the governor.

I'm not an expert, the answer is based on documents listed below.


Emergency Airplane RATs, Michael J. Zolidis, Hamilton Sundstrand, 2006.

  • A ram air turbine from Hamilton Sundstrand has a mechanical speed governor to vary the RAT blades angle according to the airspeed, and maintain a constant rotational speed.

  • At low speed, the blade angle is maintained near-perpendicular to the airflow to extract the most energy possible. When the ram speed increases, the angle is progressively reduced.

  • HS seems to measure the RAT power at 130 KEAS (Knots Equivalent Air Speed), e.g. the A380 RAT is 62” (1.57 m) diameter and delivers 85 HP (63 kW) at 130 KEAS. This mean at 130 KEAS or above, the full power is delivered.

Airbus A330 FCOM - Hydraulics

  • Logic for RAT extension.
    enter image description here

Uncommanded Ram Air Turbine (RAT) extensions - Airbus

  • The RAT auto-deploys when both engines fail, or manually from a panel overhead. It's prevented to deploy on the ground, and below 100 KCAS

  • The speed value is provided by the ADIRU.

  • The RAT is able to be extended in all flight envelope conditions.

Embraer 190 - Airplane Operations Manual

  • There is no maximum altitude or speed for RAT deployment
  • Deployment occurs whenever AC buses are not powered or manually.
  • RAT deployment takes 8 seconds.
  • RAT has its full capacity at 130 KEAS or above.
  • Below 130 KEAS, only the AC bus is powered. DC buses are powered by the batteries, as well as the standby AC bus through a DC/AC converter.

ETOPS CAA

  • For ETOPS, three electrical power sources are required. If the RAT is one of them, it must be demonstrated as reliable (extension and generation).

  • The extension mustn't rely on engine power :-)


The most popularized RAT use may be for AC143 Gimli Glider, with a dual engine loss.

More:


enter image description here

  1. Bombardier BD700-1A11 Global 5000 (source)
  2. Airbus A320 Flight test (source)
  3. Bombardier CRJ700 (source)
  4. US Navy T-45A (source)
  5. Airbus A330 (source)
  6. Boeing B747-8 (picture by Gregor Schläger, source)
  7. Boeing B777, RAT extension switch (source)
$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @FreeMan, the first thing you want to do when your engines fail is to push down to accelerate to the best glide speed which is something like 205 knots at flaps 1+F and at least 220 knots when clean. The batteries have enough energy to keep ELAC1 and ECAM alive and the hydraulic accumulator has enough pressure to move the elevators to get you there. $\endgroup$ – Jan Hudec Sep 4 '15 at 13:30
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Batteries & hydraulic accumulator - makes much more sense now! Thanks! $\endgroup$ – FreeMan Sep 4 '15 at 13:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @FreeMan, indeed. The RAT takes some time to deploy and spin up, so you need batteries to bridge the gap anyway. The reason for RAT is that batteries wouldn't have enough power for the around half an hour you can be gliding down from cruise altitude (Air Transat 236 glided for 29 minutes). $\endgroup$ – Jan Hudec Sep 4 '15 at 13:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @mins, APU has maximum altitude that is in most cases lower than typical cruise altitude and many of the all-engine-out cases were because of lack of fuel anyway. Windmilling engines can indeed produce some hydraulic power (the A320 training manual mentions it), but for jet engines it requires speed that is too high for efficient glide. $\endgroup$ – Jan Hudec Sep 4 '15 at 15:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is also no maximum RAT deployment speed on the Embraer 170/190-series commercial jets. $\endgroup$ – Porcupine911 Sep 4 '15 at 21:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.