This video details with an example why not to reject takeoff after $V_1$.

It contains an example of a 747 running off the end of the runway, due to a rejected takeoff past $V_1$ prompted by an engine fire warning. It would appear to be a -200 combi variant with rear cargo door. Faint 'Air France' titles are visible.

What aircraft and flight was this?

  • $\begingroup$ The first part of that video reminds me of some crash I read about where an unnoticed tire damage caused overheat and fire inside the plane. $\endgroup$
    – PlasmaHH
    Jun 18 '15 at 11:49
  • $\begingroup$ @PlasmaHH this one? $\endgroup$ Jun 18 '15 at 12:25
  • $\begingroup$ Yep, I think that was the one. $\endgroup$
    – PlasmaHH
    Jun 18 '15 at 12:31

The copilot rejected the takeoff above V1 in response to the engine fire warning.

The aircraft in question:

  • Air France plane operating as flight 187
  • Boeing 747-200 SCD (side cargo door) registration N4506H
  • Aircraft had company number 22794 and manufacturer serial number 558.

The incident occurred on the 24 of July 1988 at Delhi airport. An overview can be found here.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Ask a question and then answer it yourself. Is that becoming a trend on SE? ? :p $\endgroup$ Jun 18 '15 at 10:40
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ @VictorJuliet that's always been possible on SE. Since I had to search for it and look it up I figured why not to share it :) $\endgroup$ Jun 18 '15 at 11:05
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @VictorJuliet Perfectly acceptable on SE. $\endgroup$ Jun 18 '15 at 11:28
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @VictorJuliet it is not a trend yet but it is fine, acceptable and encouraged. $\endgroup$
    – vasin1987
    Jun 18 '15 at 11:54
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @VictorJuliet See this meta question $\endgroup$
    – Pondlife
    Jun 18 '15 at 13:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.