3
$\begingroup$

I recently got the polar curve of an aircraft with the method of Anderson. But this method is too old.

Does someone know a recent method for the polar curve without using CFD?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Did you try Makino-san's method? If you want more precision, you need to invest a lot more work, and the best methods are not necessarily the newest ones. $\endgroup$ – Peter Kämpf Apr 7 '15 at 20:32
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ What do you mean, "too old?" Last I checked, algorithms aren't exactly perishable. $\endgroup$ – cpast Apr 7 '15 at 22:32
  • $\begingroup$ Really? How about Newton? $\endgroup$ – rbp Apr 9 '15 at 22:46
1
$\begingroup$

Here are some other methods (excluding CFD and computational ones) for building up a polar curve:

  • Wind tunnel testing, one of the earliest methods, still one of the most applied and explored one.
  • Flight testing ("dynamically scaled" model or a 1:1 real prototype)
  • Empirical methods (e.g. Hoerner's books on "Lift" and "Drag")
  • Reverse calculations; i.e. if the performance charts AND the engine deck (force model) is published or known, then the flight performance chapter of the aircraft operations manual could be used, at least to a certain confidence level, to guess about the polar curve for different configurations and conditions.
  • If you know a few speeds of best endurance/best range glide, you could get an idea of the CL/CD at those speeds, and if you know the mass of the aircraft, the polar curve can be plotted.
  • Asking the manufacturer certainly could help (if not a model of commercial competition)
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.