Use of checklists is a 'special emphasis area' during FAA private and commercial checkrides but there are a lot of comments in pilot forums about using flows instead, often - but not always - in the context of airline operations.

What is a flow, and what is the difference between a flow and a checklist? When should a pilot prefer one or the other? Or are they used together?

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The difference is that the pilots who rely on "flows" waste less time on the gound but have a lot more accidents and "incidents" compared to people who use checklists. $\endgroup$ Feb 17, 2015 at 16:27
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @TylerDurden Another difference is pilots who rely (solely) on "flows" without backing them up with a checklist will probably fail a lot of checkrides because they didn't use the checklist. $\endgroup$
    – voretaq7
    Feb 17, 2015 at 18:38

6 Answers 6


Generally speaking a checklist is an actual list of items to check, and a flow is a pattern of movement across the aircraft controls (switches, dials, etc.) which will accomplish some subset of the items on a checklist.

A flow should be essentially "muscle memory" for a pilot and performed by rote, where a checklist may be more detailed and include more specific guidance.

As you can probably tell flows and checklists are closely related (with flows usually being derived from checklists). The two are complimentary tools that are used together: A pilot will follow a flow, and then verify that the required items have been completed using the checklist.
In larger/more complicated aircraft it's not possible to fully memorize some of the checklists, so flows are used to accomplish the "red box" immediate action items before proceeding to the full checklist.

As a simple example, consider the engine power loss flow & checklist for a Piper Cherokee.

Engine Power Loss Flow (Red Arrow & Numbers)

  1. Mixture (Set appropriately - usually "Rich")
  2. Throttle (Set appropriately)
  3. Carb Heat / Alternate Air (On)
  4. Magnetos (Both)
  5. Electric Fuel Pump (On)
  6. Primer (In & Locked)
  7. Fuel Selector (On a tank that has fuel)

Manufacturer's Engine Power Loss Checklist (Blue Numbers)

  1. Fuel Selector - Switch to a tank containing fuel.
  2. Electric Fuel Pump - On
  3. Mixture - Rich
  4. Carb Heat - On
  5. Engine Gauges - Check for an indication of the cause of power loss
  6. Primer - Check Locked.
  7. If no fuel pressure is indicated check tank selector position to be sure it is on a tank containing fuel.
  8. Ignition Switch - "Left" then "Right" then back to "BOTH."
  9. Throttle and Mixture - Different settings.
    (This may restore power if problem is too rich or too lean a mixture, or a partial fuel system restriction.)
  10. Try another fuel tank.
    (Water in the fuel could take some time to be used up, and allowing the engine to windmill may restore power. If power loss is due to water, fuel pressure indications will be normal.)

Flow & Checklist illustrated on panel

In this example the flow accomplishes nearly all the checklist items, but it does so moving over the panel in one direction. As a practical matter the flow is accomplished by just moving your hand along the bottom of the panel: "Push the mixture. Push the throttle. Pull the carb heat. Twist the mag key. Flip all the switches UP (on). Pull the primer and make sure it doesn't move. Move the fuel selector lever to the other tank."
Completing the flow takes less than 10 seconds and can be done with one hand while your other hand is pitching for best glide speed.

The manufacturer's checklist for an engine power loss moves around the panel in a more haphazard way, but it also adds a few items (checking the engine gauges & fuel pressure indication), and provides more specific guidance on possible causes like fuel contamination (water in the fuel) & how to deal with them. These items could be important if the memory items from the flow don't restore engine power, assuming you have time (altitude) to spend troubleshooting them.



A flow is like a fluid movement in specific directions across panels for a specific purpose, to set up the airplane. It is meant to be a muscle memory method.


Engine Fire


A checklist is a "to do list", which ensures that important and/or required steps are taken for a particular tasks.


Why one is chosen?

Flows are used to go through all checks of the aircraft without running through an actual checklist. Flows are to be memorized mostly by muscle memory, and kept at least semi-congruent in their execution.

Can they used together?


A flow contains information about how to quickly set up the airplane during different phases of flight. Pilots can speed through the steps of a flow. A flow may not be identical each time and can change according to situation, without omitting necessary steps.

Flows can be verified by checklists to ensure that they are complete. Once pilots follow items in a checklist overtime, they will memorize the key steps required for a particular task.

Final words

Flows can be rushed, checklists cannot. Steps can be omitted in flows, steps cannot be omitted in checklists.

Further Reading:


Flows do not and have never been a replacement for the checklist. Airlines train flows for efficiency and safety. A flow is followed by a checklist in every phase of flight. If an item is missed on the flow the checklist catches it. Flows are SAFE and efficient. All of the U.S. airlines teach flows that must be memorized and followed by the checklist.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As you point out flows are efficient and safe. They are not a short-cut. A tremendous amount of experience at the manufacturer and the airlines goes into the development of a flow procedure followed" by a "read-and-do/verify" checklist (much shorter than the flow) designed to ensure the critical safety items are not missed. $\endgroup$
    – user22445
    Nov 13, 2021 at 22:16

I would add that a flow is a rote memorized set of tasks based on manufacturer's checklists which need to be accomplished within a short amount of time to ensure vital systems in each phase of flight are set and working properly. They are utilized during time and work critical phases of a flight where multiple critical tasks need to be performed quickly and the time simply doesn't exist to laboriously go through a checklist for the moment. For instance, an high performance airplane making its takeoff roll on an instrument departure and climbout on a published departure will make use of workflows to set the plane for climbout and and handle all high workload tasks e.g. trimming, power settings, radio frequencies and communications with departure control, monitoring aircraft systems and engines in congested airspace, etc. Checklists will then be utilized by the crew as time and workload permit doing so. This was confirmed by a friend of mine who flies Dash 8s for American Eagle.

Workflows are useful in emergency situation, particularly those at low altitude, on takeoff and climbout, etc, where the time may not permit carefully running through a checklist to handle critical items, though emergency checklists will be use, again, if time and workload permit.

A checklist is just that - a list of items which the manufacturer recommends be checked and set a certain way during each aspect of flight. But the pilot's first responsibility is to fly the airplane and not get caught up reading a list at a critical time. Flows serve as a stopgap measure to set critical systems until a checklist can be reviewed properly.


Flows are not a "shortcut" to avoid checklists. They are a natural progression of important items to check, that allow you to think of the whole system represented by each item on the list. See http://studentpilotnews.com/2013/11/27/one-checklist-works-every-airplane/ and http://www.flyaoamedia.com/aoa/the-mystery-of-flows-vs-checklists/ to see how to use both together.

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ please add here the relevant content of your links, other sites may disappear, making your answer less useful. $\endgroup$
    – Federico
    Jun 26, 2017 at 15:19

Flows are basically ways to avoid doing checklists. If you use a checklist you do not need a "flow" because the checklist determines the order of items to be checked so a "flow" is completely superfluous. The "flow" is just a way of checking things ad hoc without using an actual list to save time.

The reason why commercial pilots use "flows" is because if they used a checklist for a lot of activites (which they should do) it would take too much time. Seriously, do you want 300 people waiting at the gate and leaving 20 minutes late because the pilot is still working through checklist number 7 and making sure the backup oxygen tank is pressurized or whatever? Using "flows" becomes a matter of practicality.

Where flows become really dangerous is on those private jets where some arrogant CEO is demanding they take off "right now" and the crew starts doing "flows" and skipping checklists. A perfect example is the Gulfstream IV crash last year that killed Lewis Katz, some media mogul, and six other people. The pilot failed to disengage the elevator gust lock. That's the kind of thing that happens when you start doing "flows".

-------------------- concerning flight crews not using checklists

One of my commenters seems to have the idea that "professional" flight crews always do complete checklists. This is just completely untrue. I gave examples in my response comment. Also, I will add another example here: Once I was a passenger in an AA 737 and there had been severe winter storm and the plane was badly iced. So, we spent at least an hour sitting there waiting for the de-icing to be completed. It's done and the flight crew just taxi-ed out and departed without checking anything. I almost interrupted the departure to talk to the captain and ask him, "Are you jerkoffs going to inspect the wings and empennage or should I?" For them to just depart with no inspection with such bad icing conditions was just incredibly stupid. (See here for typical crew procedures after icing: https://www.boeing.com/commercial/aeromagazine/articles/2010_q4/2/)

  • 8
    $\begingroup$ Uhhh... actually... yes. I want the pilot to do every item on his/her checklist and definitely that backup oxygen tank should be pressurized if that's what someone has determined should happen, and it was important enough to include on a checklist. Some things aren't on the checklist, some things are. The things that are, are important enough to be. So yes, I don't want anything skipped. If this was standard operating procedure, we wouldn't wait an extra 20 minutes at the gate: the pilots would arrive 20 minutes earlier. $\endgroup$
    – Harv
    Feb 19, 2015 at 22:18
  • $\begingroup$ This is just not true. Professional pilots use checklists. A professional pilot that does not use a checklist when one is specified, will quickly become an ex professional pilot. The time used to run through checklists is accounted for in operations. It has to be. $\endgroup$
    – Jpe61
    Nov 12, 2021 at 12:51
  • $\begingroup$ @Jpe61 That is simply not true. I already cited the Gulfstream accidents as a typical example of professional pilots not using checklists at all. Also, I have many times seen commercial ACPs show up at a gate get in the cockpit without doing a walkaround and then departing faster than a checklist would allow for. Also, I have many times been in a cabin when a replacement flight crew arrived, entered the cockpit and then NEVER entered the cabin. To do certain items on the checklist for virtually all planes, including 737s requires entering the cabin. $\endgroup$ Nov 13, 2021 at 20:50
  • $\begingroup$ @TylerDurden This answer is just plainly wrong! Professional pilots use flows followed by checklists. Of course there are examples where professional pilots took shortcuts (a famous example is HCY522, where the crew skipped an important checklist item and paid with their lives), but in general both flows and checklists are rigorously followed. As Jpe61 said, crews violating these principle will be quickly fired. $\endgroup$
    – Bianfable
    Nov 13, 2021 at 21:46

This site is temporarily in read-only mode and not accepting new answers.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .