I never turn them on, but I do turn them off if I notice them. Is this a relic from the age when people lit up next to you and you wanted to blow away the smoke? The system must weigh almost a ton on a large aircraft and seems pretty unpopular and hard to maintain.

  • 14
    $\begingroup$ Having flown on older airliners without gaspers recently, they are indispensable. The cabin heats up a ton and it's a lot harder to maintain per-seat comfort without airflow. $\endgroup$
    – egid
    Commented Feb 3, 2015 at 18:54
  • 34
    $\begingroup$ Do you have a source for your "seems pretty unpopular" comment, or is this a personal opinion? I for one welcome fresh air, and the ability to direct it and modulate it. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 3, 2015 at 19:49
  • 16
    $\begingroup$ There's the psychological effect of giving the passenger something to fiddle with, that makes them feel a little bit in control of a situation where they would otherwise feel powerless. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 3, 2015 at 21:46
  • 13
    $\begingroup$ The fact that you turn them off when you notice them is direct evidence that those air vents are popular with some people, otherwise you would find them turned off each time you found yourself sitting in an airplane. In my case, I do use those little airjets, I'm overweight and my extra large forehead needs the extra cooling from time to time. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2015 at 10:20
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I love those air jets. I find few things more refreshing than the flow of air over my face when I'm trying to relax on an plane. $\endgroup$
    – DaveDev
    Commented Feb 4, 2015 at 10:48

6 Answers 6


Why do airliners have them? Because passengers like them.

When you're sitting in the penalty box waiting for a departure slot and the air conditioning system is barely running the extra cool air you can get from those vents may be the only thing keeping passengers from strangling the screaming child kicking the seat.

Also a common "cure" for airsickness is fresh air -- blowing cool air over someone's face will often help with symptoms of motion sickness, and may prevent a nauseous passenger from actually vomiting. Opening these overhead "gasper vents" and directing them at the passenger's face provides a quick way of doing this.

  • $\begingroup$ +1 I always set it to low, and if possible, just in front of me (rather than on me). Since I'm not really feeling well during takeoff (getting better as I finish my 3rd dozen of flights), I truly appreciate that. $\endgroup$
    – yo'
    Commented Feb 4, 2015 at 0:33
  • $\begingroup$ +1 what @yo' said. The fresh cabin air from the vents on most planes does tend to be rather cold and dry, which can make pointing the vent at full blast at your face kind of uncomfortable. Fortunately, though, the vents are adjustable, and opening yours just a little, and pointing it in front of you, saves you from having to breathe 300 other passengers' stale BO all the way. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2015 at 11:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The motion of an airplane doesn't bother me, but the air quality certainly does. Without the (slightly) better air from those vents, I'd just be miserable. $\endgroup$
    – KRyan
    Commented Feb 4, 2015 at 14:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ +1 for the airsickness: for those of us who suffer with motion sickness, the vent can be the difference between "An uncomfortable flight" and "Projectile vomiting". Trust me, if I'm throwing up on a plane, you'll want your own supply of fresh air. $\endgroup$
    – Jon Story
    Commented Feb 5, 2015 at 12:17
  • $\begingroup$ So I realize this is by far and away the most popular answer, but when the answer to almost every other question that starts out with "why do" or "why don't" and contains the word "airlines", usually boils down to cost, I'm not so sure I agree with "because pax like them" as the reason they (still) exist. $\endgroup$
    – CGCampbell
    Commented Feb 6, 2015 at 11:48

The airjet openings are connected to a long duct running along the ceiling. Since the air volume inside the cabin is restricted, fresh air must be pumped into it constantly. It is bleed air from the compressor section of the engine, which is first cooled and then enters the cabin via those ducts which feed all the little vents or airjets, as you call them. Passengers can open or close them individually and direct the flow for best comfort. The general idea is that some vents will be closed, but enough are open during every flight so the needed recirculation of air can happen. If more are closed, the pressure in the duct will be higher, so the flow through the remaining vents will increase.

The total weight of all the cabin ducting is a minor consideration, it's only a few dozen gram per passenger.

  • 21
    $\begingroup$ Cabin air recirculation will still happen if all the passenger vents are closed, through other vents in the ceiling $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 4, 2015 at 0:22

The primary reason is that not everyone likes the same temperatures. I happen to be cold-natured and like to be warm. Other people are hot-natured and like to use copious amounts of air conditioning. These allow all of us to stay relatively comfortable in the same cabin.

Also, when you're sitting on the ramp in the summer, it's more than 100 degrees Farenheit outside, and the boarding door is still open, you'll learn to appreciate these things quickly, especially if you've been standing in the jetway a while before taking your seat. Personally, I usually turn mine off during flight, but I do tend to use them on the ramp and sometimes during taxi in the summer and/or unusually hot climates.


Lowest cost is king if you can get away with it.
Personal air vents provide more flexibility than if they were absent and the overall cost is lower.

If personal airjets are available then the jet temperature and maximum available flow can be set to suit people with preferences on the cold side of normal, while the mean temperature can be hotter than would suit a significant proportion of people.

If, instead, the cabin needed to be maintained at a temperature that most people would consider acceptable then, in the absence of personal vents, the whole cabin would need to be cooled to that temperature. Some people would then feel too cold, which can be dealt with by clothing or blankets, and most people would be comfortable.

In the first case you have lower than otherwise energy use with "outliers" being addressed with airjets.

In the second case you have higher than otherwise energy use with outliers being addressed with blankets. The energy cost of the blankets is zero but overall it still costs more this way.

FWIW I'm an air-jet loving traveller and greatly dislike aircraft without them.

  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to Aviation and giving a very nice first answer here. An excellent slightly different view of the reasoning. $\endgroup$
    – CGCampbell
    Commented Feb 5, 2015 at 14:44
  • $\begingroup$ @CGCampbell Thanks. I'm an engineer (Electrical by qualification but anything technical by bent). This is the perspective the accountants come from and the engineers have to work out how to address :-). (Alas, it also means you end up with Lithium Ion batteries in DreamLiners, when Lithium Ferro Phosphate make way more engineering sense). $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 6, 2015 at 2:48

Although probably not the primary reason airlines have them in the first place, there is another great reason to use them. Having fresh "outside" air blow in front of you displaces the viruses/bacteria/etc. from sick passenger's coughs and sneezes away from entering your nose and mouth.

  • $\begingroup$ The air coming out of the gaspers is exactly the same air that's blown into the cabin through the regular ventilation system. $\endgroup$
    – Lightsider
    Commented Jun 12, 2015 at 14:07

Make the passenger feel he's in control of something. The practical use is to fight rising temperatures and odors, but i also quite like the oxygen.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .