16
$\begingroup$

I was under the impression that things like this: enter image description here

and soon this enter image description here

and even this enter image description here

Are drones.

When and how did the media and the general public get the idea that these: enter image description here

Are also drones?

I'm not going to argue with the fact that the label has been given. But remote controlled quad coppers are just another type of remote controlled aircraft, what makes them different from RC planes and RC helos? (Nothing.) So why are they being deliberately group with full sized military aircraft that are used for killing terrorist and patrolling dangerous regions?

So, while RC quad copters have been labeled by the public and the media as "drones" are they really? What makes "a drone" really a drone?

$\endgroup$
  • 9
    $\begingroup$ When I use a word it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less. - H. Dumpty, on the definition of "Drone" $\endgroup$ – voretaq7 Dec 19 '14 at 19:49
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Pondlife A regulatory definition should exist -- I'm not sure it does right now, but it should! $\endgroup$ – voretaq7 Dec 19 '14 at 19:52
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I like the definition at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmanned_aerial_vehicle. IMHO it has nothing to do with size or mission. $\endgroup$ – JerryKur Dec 19 '14 at 19:53
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ It's a kind of bee. $\endgroup$ – hobbs Dec 20 '14 at 0:17
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Worth noting this 2014 editorial from the Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems, who are cheerfully forthright about their position - nrcresearchpress.com/doi/full/10.1139/juvs-2014-0009 $\endgroup$ – Andrew Jun 13 '16 at 17:33
16
$\begingroup$

General usage

According to Etymology Online The term drone, meaning "pilotless aircraft" dates from 1946.

It evidently encompasses all types of aircraft where no onboard human pilot is needed, either because the human pilot operates the aircraft remotely (still true for most types of military "drone" aircraft I believe) or because the aircraft systems are capable of full autonomy during some of all of a flight.

The earliest uses were probably "target drones". Which is what Wikipedia suggests.

The term does seem to have supplanted "RC aircraft" for modern small RC aircraft, especially those which carry a camera and/or from which their operators derive some value other than simply from mastering the skill of flying the vehicle.

English language is defined by usage, not by edict. So this isn't subject to rulings or appeal.

Lawmakers or other bodies might define the term more narrowly but this doesn't affect other uses of the same word.

FAA definition

The FAA talks mainly about "model aircraft" and "unmanned model aircraft" (ref.) and about Unmanned Aircraft(UA) or Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). (ref.)

They usually don't use the term drone or define it, but from their FAQ it seems they consider the terms drone and UAS to be equivalent

Myth #7:The FAA is lagging behind other countries in approving commercial drones.

Fact– This comparison is flawed. The United States has the busiest, most complex airspace in the world, including many general aviation aircraft that we must consider when planning UAS integration, because those same airplanes and small UAS may occupy the same airspace.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ because the aircraft systems are capable of full autonomy during some of all of a flight Are there any drones capable of fully automated operation with no human assistance? $\endgroup$ – Firee Jun 10 '16 at 11:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Firee As I understand it, the military ones must have some onboard programming on what to do if/when communication with home base is lost, whether momentarily or for a longer duration. At this point, it's capable of full autonomy. Part of that is probably not "finish mission by deploying ordinance", rather, "continue loitering on station, relaying SIGINT" or "return to base", but who knows... $\endgroup$ – FreeMan Jun 10 '16 at 15:24
5
$\begingroup$

"Drone" is a very general expression for a wide range of vehicles, and it is mostly used by the press and outsiders. Lately, the word has been picked up by Marketing to give model aircraft a more fancy label. People who design and use unmanned aircraft tend to use more specific expressions.

Will it return?

The earliest use of unmanned vehicles was for one-way missions, either as flying targets or as flying bombs. While the flying bombs are today mostly called cruise missiles, the term "drone" initially was reserved for the unarmed variety, serving as targets. Note that technical limits would not allow the early models to make a controlled landing. They were one-way vehicles. Only later, with better radio control, could target drones be reused.

Will it fly autonomously?

With the immense increase in computing power, the pilot did not have to be in the loop all the time, and unmanned vehicles learned to land to be reused. The term "drone" never was used by those who designed and built them in order to make a distinction between their sophisticated unmanned vehicles and those dumb, one-way drones. The whole combination of ground station, data relay and flying vehicle became an unmanned system to stress the multi-component nature of these things. The vehicle itself is now called a UAV for unmanned aerial vehicle, or UCAV in case of armed unmanned combat aerial vehicles. Other functions gave rise to names like HALE (high altitude, long endurance) which doesn't even mention the unmanned nature of these craft. But they never are called drones by their makers.

Does it carry ordnance?

If you answer all three questions "No", it is a drone. Strictly speaking, if one question has a positive answer, there is a better term for it. Note that the first question also excludes model aircraft but also more modern target drones! Taking the examples in your question, only the third picture shows a drone (if it will be shot at later and there is a distinct likelihood that it doesn't land in one piece).

Use of the term by the general public

Unfortunately, the more specific terms have never left the ghetto of specialist technical terminology, and the press has decided to call all unmanned aircraft "drones". It is similar to the word "hacker" which originally described computer experts and now is used for criminals by the public.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "(...) the term "drone" initially was reserved for the unarmed variety, serving as targets." It still is. $\endgroup$ – SQB Jun 8 '16 at 8:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that while now and then a destructive test with live warhead might be done, most missile tests are done with dummy warhead and the QF-16 drone returns to be used another day. It probably still qualifies as drone, since that is the original meaning (according to WP it originated as a pun on the name of the first target drone, de Havilland Queen Bee). $\endgroup$ – Jan Hudec Jun 13 '16 at 17:34
  • $\begingroup$ "was reserved for the unarmed.." Drones certainly have been weaponized since the beginning of the use of the term. What about the V1 or powered & gliding bombs in WWII controlled (not autonomous) through a spooled wire by either a ground controller or bombardier and referred to as "drones". It seems drones has meant whatever was in the mind of the author but most generally "unmanned". $\endgroup$ – jwzumwalt Dec 17 '17 at 17:28
  • $\begingroup$ @jwzumwalt: Who did the referring? Certainly not the designers, manufacturers or the users. The term drone has been overused by the press but that does not mean that we should commit that mistake, too. If you only had read the last section … $\endgroup$ – Peter Kämpf Dec 17 '17 at 17:59
2
$\begingroup$

An actual drone is a male honeybee which makes no honey and has no sting. The word is likely an imitatation of the sound they make when swarming. Calling military target aircraft drones was probably originally a humourous analogy. They carry no cargo, have no armaments, and like the drone which dies after its midair mating they do their job only once.

From this perspective calling an armed aircraft such as the Predator a drone does not make much sense. It performs work, most definitely has a sting, and flies many times. But the term was already familiar in the military and so its meaning got extended.

Because the meaning has recently been extended without much thought going into it, there is no broad agreement on what it means. Some would like to see the term used only for aircraft which display drone-like behavior. Others are willing to apply it to most any aircraft without a human pilot on board.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ While this is definitely interesting background, it doesn't serve the core question of what "drone" means in modern aviation usage $\endgroup$ – raptortech97 Dec 20 '14 at 4:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for you comment. You are right, it was not a full answer. I would have liked to comment on an existing answer, but am not allowed to yet because I am new here. I have expanded and rewritten my reply so that it answers the question. $\endgroup$ – David42 Dec 20 '14 at 13:37
2
$\begingroup$

The word drone comes from 1935, where U.S. Adm. William H. Standley watched the DH 82B Queen Bee (one of the first remote controlled aircrafts!) presentation. As said by DavidC, a drone is a male bee, which is needed for reproduction only! The term drone was adopted though, as a homage to the Queen Bee. The term would also fit as the only way for the plane to function is by a controller on a "mother" plane or on the ground (lazy people were called drones in England at that time).

What is considered to be a drone now can obviously be approached differently! The FAA has its definitions, H. Dumpty has a very wide way of interpreting it, I guess.

As it was misused by media a lot, the term drone must have been put on a lot of things, making a clear definition hard!

More information about the origin of the word "drone".

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

The word drone can refer to a target drone, which may be a purpose built remotely piloted vehicle (RPV) or a manned aircraft converted to an RPV for use as a target, or it may refer to a UAV or UCAV which is employed in a combat role. The word is ambiguous, but useful for some media people who can't remember what "UAV" stands for.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.