1
$\begingroup$

Just that - take away an F6F's arrestor hook and fit it with a reverse-pitch-capable propeller (and, of course, all the other odds-and-ends to make such a system work).

Would it be possible for a decently trained and experienced naval aviator to land such a modified Hellcat on a 186.2m long (611 ft) flight deck with anything approaching safety and repeatability?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ It wouldn't be a "WW2-era" Hellcat any longer with that sort of prop on it. Beta range works well, with immediate reverse thrust, because the prop stays at 100% RPM and the pitch goes negative quickly. Could the original engine spin a prop that way? Maaaybeee.... but it wasn't designed to do that, so now it's not just a new prop, but more mods. Hard to know what the sum of such hypothetical modifications would or wouldn't be able to do. $\endgroup$
    – Ralph J
    Commented Apr 24 at 13:11
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer. From what I understand, NACA and BuAer was already testing reverse pitch props on a Curtiss F6C-4 all the way back in the early 30s as a possible method of dive braking - so we're not exactly talking space-age technology here. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 24 at 20:48

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .