Timeline for Does lift-to-drag vary with anything beyond geometry?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://aviation.stackexchange.com/ with https://aviation.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 9, 2017 at 19:59 | history | edited | Peter Kämpf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 243 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2017 at 19:56 | comment | added | Peter Kämpf | @SF. Depends on the aircraft. The F-16 never recovers but stays at a high value until Mach 1.6. Unswept aircraft have a very big hump (a factor of 5 to the subsonic drag coefficient is entirely possible) but recover quickly once fully supersonic. But never anywhere to their subsonic level. | |
| Mar 9, 2017 at 18:47 | comment | added | SF. | How far beyond Mach 1 does the 'drag hump' extend? | |
| Mar 9, 2017 at 18:41 | vote | accept | SF. | ||
| Mar 9, 2017 at 18:24 | history | edited | Peter Kämpf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 107 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2017 at 18:17 | history | answered | Peter Kämpf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |