Timeline for Why would a helicopter hold a 'nose-up' in hover?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2016 at 23:11 | history | edited | user14897 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 93 characters in body
|
| Nov 29, 2016 at 23:05 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=14897 by developer User.Id=59471 | |
| Nov 29, 2016 at 23:05 | history | edited | user14897 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clearer picture, grammar, extra info
|
| Nov 29, 2016 at 13:18 | comment | added | user12007 | TV production teams and the military are generally risk-averse. I kind of doubt they'd put personnel at risk just for filming a TV show. Hovering above a building while pitching backwards into a tailwind doesn't really sound like a good idea. Even in combat situations, you'd want change that tailwind into a headwind to maintain optimal control (since you can see what's ahead of you a lot easier than what's behind). | |
| Nov 29, 2016 at 11:06 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 29, 2016 at 12:49 | |||||
| Nov 29, 2016 at 11:03 | history | answered | user12007 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |