Timeline for Are there aircraft exemptions for CPDLC in the NAT area?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://aviation.stackexchange.com/ with https://aviation.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Dec 16, 2014 at 0:06 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAviation/status/544644765414072322 | ||
| Dec 15, 2014 at 20:48 | answer | added | DeltaLima♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 25, 2014 at 17:21 | comment | added | DeltaLima♦ | Or fly through the ADS-B corridor from Canada to Iceland. There is no datalink mandate in surveillance airspace apparently. | |
| Feb 25, 2014 at 17:18 | comment | added | DeltaLima♦ | Looks like it indeed. You'll have to fly below FL350 or above FL390. Climbing through the FL350-390 block seems to be possible for unequipped aircraft. | |
| Feb 25, 2014 at 17:07 | comment | added | Lnafziger | @DeltaLima Not all tracks yet, but next year they will be and all NAT airspace in 2017. | |
| Feb 25, 2014 at 16:24 | comment | added | DeltaLima♦ | I think there is no exemption possible. But not all tracks and levels are covered by the NAT CPDLC rules. | |
| Feb 25, 2014 at 15:43 | history | asked | Lnafziger | CC BY-SA 3.0 |