Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 27 at 10:04 comment added eeesa @DeltaLima how can I read more on fighter engine exactly? any sources? books? recommendations? pls
Jul 27 at 6:19 vote accept eeesa
Jul 27 at 3:40 comment added UnrecognizedFallingObject @LevelRiverSt -- the RR Pegasus in the Harrier is an excellent example of how contrarotating spools helps controllability
Jul 27 at 1:12 comment added Level River St Flow isn't the primary reason for the high pressure and low pressure parts of the engine rotating in opposite directions Each row of rotating blades is followed by a row of stationary blades so direction of rotation of different sections doesn't matter much for flow. The main reason to reduce the gyroscope effect of the engine, which would otherwise interfere with control inputs (for example exerting a pitch torque when the pilot turns the aircraft in yaw.) To a lesser extent, power changes could exert a roll torque on the aircraft if the different sections didn;t rotate in opposite directions
Jul 26 at 11:51 comment added DeltaLima @eeesa military engines are optimised for different requirements, depending on their intended use. Generally military engines will have different needs for efficiency, reliability, maintainability, maximum power, cruising speeds etc. than the engines used on civil aircraft. The engines on a military transport aircraft are comparable to those on civil airlines. The engines on a fighter jet are totally different, and so are those on cruise missiles.
Jul 26 at 11:46 history edited DeltaLima CC BY-SA 4.0
added 939 characters in body
Jul 26 at 11:43 comment added eeesa is that what happens in military engines too? is this also how the new engines designed?
Jul 26 at 11:36 history answered DeltaLima CC BY-SA 4.0