Skip to main content
added 79 characters in body
Source Link
sophit
  • 15.8k
  • 1
  • 34
  • 78

If you want to get rid of any dependency on length, what about death per journey or per hour? That should give a "more correct" number according to your assumptions. Those statistics should also be readily available.

I agree anyway with @MikeB that "no other metric is significantly better, and all of them favour one mode of transport over all others". For example, if you consider the death per journey as I suggested, you have anyway somehow to consider that a typical journey via airplane would be much longer than a typical journey by car... Maybe you could divide the death per journey via the typical journey's length.

If you want to get rid of any dependency on length, what about death per journey or per hour? That should give a "more correct" number according to your assumptions. Those statistics should also be readily available.

I agree anyway with @MikeB that "no other metric is significantly better, and all of them favour one mode of transport over all others". For example, if you consider the death per journey as I suggested, you have anyway somehow to consider that a typical journey via airplane would be much longer than a typical journey by car...

If you want to get rid of any dependency on length, what about death per journey or per hour? That should give a "more correct" number according to your assumptions. Those statistics should also be readily available.

I agree anyway with @MikeB that "no other metric is significantly better, and all of them favour one mode of transport over all others". For example, if you consider the death per journey as I suggested, you have anyway somehow to consider that a typical journey via airplane would be much longer than a typical journey by car... Maybe you could divide the death per journey via the typical journey's length.

added 404 characters in body
Source Link
sophit
  • 15.8k
  • 1
  • 34
  • 78

If you want to get rid of any dependency on length, what about death per journey or per hour? That should give a more correct"more correct" number according to your assumptions. Those statistics should also be readily available.

I agree anyway with @MikeB that "no other metric is significantly better, and all of them favour one mode of transport over all others". For example, if you consider the death per journey as I suggested, you have anyway somehow to consider that a typical journey via airplane would be much longer than a typical journey by car...

If you want to get rid of any dependency on length, what about death per journey or per hour? That should give a more correct number according to your assumptions. Those statistics should also be readily available.

If you want to get rid of any dependency on length, what about death per journey or per hour? That should give a "more correct" number according to your assumptions. Those statistics should also be readily available.

I agree anyway with @MikeB that "no other metric is significantly better, and all of them favour one mode of transport over all others". For example, if you consider the death per journey as I suggested, you have anyway somehow to consider that a typical journey via airplane would be much longer than a typical journey by car...

Source Link
sophit
  • 15.8k
  • 1
  • 34
  • 78

If you want to get rid of any dependency on length, what about death per journey or per hour? That should give a more correct number according to your assumptions. Those statistics should also be readily available.