Timeline for Why are we still using audio to communicate between ATC and Pilot?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5 at 15:56 | comment | added | manassehkatz-Moving 2 Codidact | To match it with text, one would need to use typeback And where voice requires pressing one button, typeback requires using at least one hand, commonly two - you can type with one finger but it takes a long time - and you don't have that time in an emergency situation. | |
| Jan 4 at 19:21 | history | edited | Therac | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 107 characters in body
|
| Jan 3 at 17:35 | history | edited | Therac | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 287 characters in body
|
| Jan 3 at 17:20 | history | edited | Therac | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 287 characters in body
|
| Jan 3 at 17:11 | history | edited | Therac | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 287 characters in body
|
| Jan 3 at 17:04 | comment | added | Therac | @GabrielRodriguez I see your edit. I'll address the reasons why TTS is not used in the answer. | |
| Jan 3 at 16:59 | history | edited | Therac | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 468 characters in body
|
| Jan 3 at 16:48 | comment | added | Gabe |
Therac, thanks for bringing ACARS point. However I'm not proposing to get away from audio radio communication I'm only proposing an addition to the radio. Neither I'm proposing STT(only TTS). And I'm not suggesting a ALL text or ALL audio approach as you yourself brought up on your post for obvious redundancy reasons. Please see NOTE3 on my post.
|
|
| Jan 3 at 15:12 | history | answered | Therac | CC BY-SA 4.0 |