Take the 2-minute tour ×
Aviation Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for aircraft pilots, mechanics, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know that there is a written exam that you are required to take, but do you have to go to a class in order to study for that test? If I'm really good at just learning from a book, can I just learn that way, maybe take a couple practice tests and then take the exam? Or are they going to need proof that I went to some certified class?

More subjectively: Assuming it's allowable, is it a bad idea?

share|improve this question
1  
When it comes to regulatory questions, make sure to let us know what country you're in! –  egid May 17 at 4:25
    
Added that in :) –  Jay Carr May 17 at 4:58

2 Answers 2

up vote 9 down vote accepted

In Canada, you are required to have 40 hours of ground school instruction. See Canadian Aviation Regulations 421.26 (3)(a):

completed a minimum of 40 hours private pilot aeroplane ground school instruction on the following subjects ...

Ground school instruction is defined as (CARS 400.01):

classroom-type instruction generally given to one or more persons and covering an organized program of lectures, homework or self-paced study that adheres to an approved training program.

So, you can learn by self-study, but it needs to be an approved training program. This would mean that a flight instructor would need to sign off on the self-study program.


The FAA says:

If you are unable to attend a ground school, the self-study method can be satisfactory, provided you obtain the proper study materials and devote a reasonable amount of time to study.

The regulation is at Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations, §61.35(a)(1):

Received an endorsement, if required by this part, from an authorized instructor certifying that the applicant accomplished the appropriate ground-training or a home-study course required by this part for the certificate or rating sought and is prepared for the knowledge test ...


Because in both cases an instructor must sign off on your preparedness for the examination, and passing the examination demonstrates that you meet the standard, in my opinion, the only thing that would make self-study a bad idea is if self-study is not an effective learning method for you, which could delay your training.

share|improve this answer
    
Worth noting for the FAA answer, doesn't directly address part 141 schools (though the result is effectively the same -- you still need an endorsement showing you can take the exam). I think all Part 141 changes is who can give the instruction: ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?node=14:3.0.1.2.16.5.3.6&rgn=div8 –  dougk_ff7 May 17 at 5:29

As noted above, a ground school is not required by the FAA but a sign-off by an instructor is.

I do not know if this is still valid, but a decade ago, one of the big pilot training companies (King? Sporty's? Gleim?) would send you the equivalent of an instructor's endorsement after you took that company's ground school course in the comfort of your own home. So at least back then, yes, if you sent in the required completed home school tests, you did not need to attend a ground school class.

Is it a good idea? I vote NO. the reason is that these courses teach pretty specifically to the tests and little else. There is a lot of knowledge that you won't get by taking these courses without an instructor even though you can pass the test. Remember that they are teaching the MINIMUM you need to be safe. Choose well.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.