Aviation Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for aircraft pilots, mechanics, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am currently trying to study aircraft performance and I have some difficulties distinguishing between rate of climb and climb gradient.

Can someone explain what are the differences between the two of them?

share|improve this question
3  
2  
seriously? cross-posted and migrated? i.imgur.com/ZemDE1R.gif – Federico Mar 24 at 17:19
1  
Would feel better about closing as a dup if the word "gradient" figured prominently in either the question and/or the answers in the "duplicated" question. – Ralph J Mar 24 at 17:40
3  
Consider a balloon which ascends at 528 fpm in still air. It has an infinite climb gradient (528/0). A commercial jet travelling 600 mph and climbing 528 fpm would cover 10 miles, for a gradient of 1% (528 / 52800). – jamesqf Mar 24 at 17:43
    
@RalphJ Right, I don't see the answer for this question in the other question-answer set. – SMS von der Tann Mar 24 at 18:12
up vote 10 down vote accepted

The climb gradient is the percentage of the rise over run (50% if you are climbing at 45 degrees) that your aircraft is climbing at while the rate of climb is the speed at which you are climbing based off the airspeed and climb gradient (given in feet per mintue).

share|improve this answer
    
@mins Yup, just that. – SMS von der Tann Mar 25 at 16:35

A climb gradient is a geometry problem -- the relationship of two points in 3-dimensional space... to get from one to the other you gain X' in Y NM, so you have X/Y feet per nautical mile as a climb gradient. Or it can be expressed in percent slope -- the two terms are different ways of describing the same thing.

A climb rate is simply speed in the vertical dimension, X feet gained per minute. It is typically read on the Vertical Speed Indicator.

The two come together when the discussion turns to "what climb performance is required to clear an obstacle." The surveyors determine the geometry between a starting point (such as, the end of the runway at 35' AGL) and an end point (an obstacle at some distance from the end of the runway with a given height, plus a prescribed amount of clearance). Then they publish this as a required climb gradient which will ensure that you'll cross the obstacle with the required clearance. They don't know, or care, what speed you'll be flying; they've surveyed the geometry of the runway and obstacle and applied the regulatory 'required clearance', so their work here is done.

For the pilot in the cockpit, though, I don't have a way to determine my climb gradient at a glance. Performance computers will do that and typically work the calculations to determine how much weight I can take off with, in order to have adequate climb capability, and at some lighter weight they may tell me what my climb gradient will actually be. But it's not a value that I can read off of an instrument as I'm flying.

For a given groundspeed, flying exactly "this" climb gradient will yield "that" vertical speed... define any two and the third can be calculated. So you will often see charts that tell you at various groundspeed values, what vertical speed you will need to maintain in order to achieve the necessary gradient. So the two concepts are related, but nevertheless distinct.

As the not-really-a-duplicate question shows, the airspeed that will give the best climb gradient is not necessarily the airspeed that will give the best climb rate. Normally those are referred to as Vx and Vy -- best angle of climb speed (best gradient -- most vertical distance climbed per distance of forward travel) is Vx, and best rate of climb speed is Vy (best rate of climb speed -- most altitude gained per unit of time). The Vy speed is typically faster than Vx.

share|improve this answer
    
Re "...flying exactly "this" climb gradient will yield "that" vertical speed..", if you disregard the possibility of up & down drafts, of course :-) – jamesqf Mar 24 at 21:30
1  
@jamesqf The up/down-drafts would take you off of both the gradient as well as the vertical speed. But yes, these illustrations work much better without real-world annoyances. :-) I don't want to rely on finding more updrafts than down in order to clear the obstacles, and if I do find more down-drafts than up-drafts... that's why we clear them by a margin, I suppose! – Ralph J Mar 24 at 21:35

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.