Take the 2-minute tour ×
Aviation Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for aircraft pilots, mechanics, and enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I saw this question from History Stack Exchange and noted that the US is still using the imperial measurement system such as feet, miles and pounds.

Given that a plane may need to fly from one country to another, is there any standardisation across the globe? Does planes manufactured by Boeing use one system and planes made by the Airbus another system? If not, wouldn't it be very easy for pilots to make calculation error?

share|improve this question
    
What about the literal nuts and bolts? I assume they are all metric? Is there anything in aeronautics engineering that is still imperial? –  RoboKaren Jul 11 at 15:32

3 Answers 3

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Outside US, SI is generally used for everything except altitude, distance and speed.

  • Altitude: 1000 ft happens to be reasonable vertical separation, which is somewhat easier to calculate with than the corresponding SI figure 300 m.
  • Distance: There are two quantities that were never converted to decimal. Time and angle. Since we didn't switch to gradianss, it makes sense to keep nautical mile, which corresponds to 1 minute along meridian or equator, as it makes calculating distances from navigational maps somewhat easier. If the maps were marked in gradian coordinates, 1 gradian would be 100 km and kilometres would be used.
  • Speed: Obviously based on the unit of distance in use.

In Russia, Commonwealth of Independent States (most former Soviet countries) and China (and I am not sure whether some other Asian countries), metric system is used for everything. I believe in Russia they recently switched to flight levels based on feet, but they do use metres below transition altitude.

Before second world war, aircraft built in continental Europe usually had instruments in metric units as well. Without prevalence of US-built planes after the war, we'd be probably using metric in Europe for everything too.

share|improve this answer

Unless Boeing has recently changed to the metric system in their design work, the short answer to the question as to whether Boeing and Airbus use different systems insofar as aircraft manufacture is yes. I'm only familiar with Boeing up through the 747-400. Perhaps others can provide an answer for later models.

The Boeing Weight and Balance Control and Loading manuals I have do provide kilogram pages following the pound pages, but that the pound is the controlling unit is also stated.

Interestingly, for moment limitations, the manuals follow the inch-pound pages with inch-kilogram pages. In other words, they're mixing systems, which I believe to be unwise as the net effect is to introduce a third, hybridized system.

In the past, many 747 freighter flights that I flew were slightly over gross at takeoff due to the fact that the common conversion used for kilograms to pounds was 2.2 when the actual value is 2.20462262.

As I remember, only the U.S. and Liberia are still non-metric officially. There is a political dimension to this which you can explore at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metrication_in_the_United_States.

share|improve this answer
    
    
Burma is also non-metric, though they're making moves towards metrication. –  David Richerby Jul 11 at 18:50

I can tell you that all of the airplanes that I have flown (which are US registered, but some are French built) use the following:

  • Feet for height
  • Knots for airspeed (Nautical Miles/Hour)
    • Some old airplanes still use Miles/Hour (MPH)
  • Nautical Miles or feet for distance
  • Statue Miles or feet for weather (visibility and RVR)
  • Mach for high speed flight
  • Inches of Mercury for altimeter settings
    • Most of the airplanes that I have flown can actually switch between "hg and hPa (mb).
  • pounds/square inch for pressure
  • Pounds for the fuel quantity on the aircraft (read by the fuel gauges)
  • Pounds/hour for fuel flow
  • Gallons to order/purchase fuel

These are pretty standard in most of the Americas (North/Central/South), but in certain parts of the world some of the units are different:

  • Meters for height
  • Kilometers or meters for distance and weather
  • HectoPascals (hPa/Millibars) for altimeter settings
  • Kilograms for fuel quantity on the aircraft
  • Kilograms/hour for fuel flow
  • Liters to order/purchase fuel
share|improve this answer
    
Russia, CIS countries and China are the main notable exceptions that use the metric system I believe. –  MikeFoxtrot Mar 22 at 18:31
    
@Manfred For altitude, yes. For altimeter settings, and runway distance, visibility, etc metric is far more common. –  Lnafziger Mar 22 at 18:45
    
All METARs I've seen anywhere outside America had metres for visibility and hectopascals (=millibars, but hPa is more common name) for altimeter settings. –  Jan Hudec Mar 22 at 21:41
    
@JanHudec Canada and Mexico both use SM for visibility, and both of those plus South America use "hg for the altimeter. The Bahamas and most of the Caribbean are the same. –  Lnafziger Mar 22 at 22:31
    
@Lnafziger: That's why I said America and not USA. –  Jan Hudec Mar 23 at 10:34

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.